Excerpts from recent Minnesota editorials
Raising standards on pet breeders
The implementation July 1 of a new state law governing large commercial dog and cat breeders is a welcome step in improving quality control of Minnesota’s segment of America’s $55 billion (and growing) pet industry. While the American Pet Products Association reports live animal purchases made up only about $2.23 billion of those expenditures last year nationally, problems rooted in pets bred at large-scale operations no doubt contributed to $27 billion spent on veterinary care and medicines in 2013. Not to mention the strife and struggles those animals and their owners face.
So like more than two dozen other states, Minnesota finally this legislative session adopted a well-defined inspection and licensing system for large-scale breeders. After years in the making, this measure should improve the quality of pets bred and sold, which also means more satisfied consumers.
It’s worth noting that Minnesota adopted this law in large part because the federal Animal Welfare Act, created almost a half-century ago, has long been criticized for not being strict enough. For example, until November, it did not govern large-scale breeding operations that sold animals directly to the public. The U.S. Department of Agriculture could oversee only large operations that sold “wholesale” to pet stores.
Minnesota’s new law addresses that and many other requirements involving facilities, standards of care, confinement areas, records and identification of animals, transportation and veterinary care. Some examples of those most beneficial are:
Animals must be fed at least once each day and watered twice daily.
An animal sold or otherwise distributed by a commercial breeder must be accompanied by a veterinary health certificate completed by a veterinarian.
Animals must not be sold, traded or given away before the age of eight weeks unless a veterinarian determines it would be in the best interests of the animal.
Those are a few of more than 30 requirements, most of which should not raise concerns from responsible breeders. Certainly, the new law requires more time and money from large-scale breeding operations. The other part of that equation, though, is those breeders will be able to command higher prices for animals because this law should improve the quality of those animals.
St. Cloud Times, July 8
Schools need a safety plan
University of Minnesota creative writing professor Julie Schumacher published a chilling op-ed in The New York Times last month that detailed her experience talking with a student whose writing about killing people got so extreme that it instilled fear in classmates.
Schumacher’s piece, titled “Was This Student Dangerous?” showed what appeared to be unclear or insufficient institutional policy for how teachers are to handle situations where they feel a student may be harmful to themself or others. After Schumacher contacted campus police and mental health officials, the plan was for her and a teaching assistant to meet with the student in private and ask a simple question: “Do you have a plan to harm yourself or anyone else?”
If the student had answered yes, there wasn’t a plan for how to proceed, Schumacher wrote.
Schumacher’s writing doesn’t mention names of any people or the University itself. This indicates that her intentions weren’t to implicate the school, but rather bring up an important public safety and mental health concern in higher education. After the essay came out, Schumacher told MinnPost that the director of the University’s Office for Student Conduct and Academic Integrity contacted her, saying that the administration didn’t take issue with her piece and that they wanted to open up a dialogue to find out how to best support Schumacher and others in the future.
We encourage the University and other higher education institutions to take a close look at how they’d handle a situation like the one Schumacher faced. Campus leaders must remember that mental health help must extend past clinics and support groups – it needs to get to a more personal level on campus.
With recent, devastating campus shootings across the nation, it’s never been more important to ensure we have more-than-adequate systems in place to stop potential tragedies before they happen. And even if students who seem disturbed actually have no violent tendencies, it’s still crucial we provide all the mental health support services they need and deserve.
Minnesota Daily, July 9